Follow us:
|
#Minutes of the Annual General Meeting of Bath University Venturers Cricket Club, 2009.#
The 2009 AGM of Bath University Venturers Cricket Club took place on
September 17th in All Bar One, a conveniently located bar with
conveniently large tables, which is conveniently half empty because
it’s not actually very good. Thirteen people were present. The meeting
opened for business at 18:45, which was the earliest moment at which
everybody was sitting down and had a drink to hand.
-
Treasurer’s Report.
This item was taken first as it was likely to be the main business
of the meeting. Rob explained that in April this year we had been
told (rather quietly) that we would be charged pitch fees for the
following year: even this year we had to pay once, under
exceptional circumstances. He explained that we should therefore
have to take decisions about the financing of the club going
forward. Some unease manifested itself at this point, but Rob got
a grip and didn’t mention the elephant in the room, being fit for
purpose or the end of the day.
Currently the club has a bank balance of £2309.34 and about
a hundred pounds in cash, but we still owe nearly £900
pounds for old teas and about £600 for less old
teas. Cheques have been sent to Sulis for these amounts from time
to time, but they do not attempt to cash them: nevertheless, we
have to assume that eventually those debts will actually be paid
by us. Our reserves are therefor around £800.
Pitch fees for a year on the basis of our current fixture list
would be around £1100. There is some room for reducing that
by modifying the fixture list in essentially harmless ways, but
they will not make a large difference.
Teas at Sulis currently cost £75.90. When we pay for teas at
away matches we are typically asked for £30, and we do the
same for sides that visit us. The teas are therefore
underfunded. We do not feel that they are good value for money,
and now that we are paying for the pitches also we are perhaps
more willing to complain. It is a condition of using the pitches
for afternoon matches that we buy the Sulis tea.
There was a wide-ranging discussion of how to fund the pitch fees,
in a secure way and without being unfair to particular
groups. Among the points raised were:
-
in view of the tea costs, the differential between afternoon and
evening match fees is perhaps too small
-
we currently do not charge for nets, but it would be possible and
perhaps desirable to do so
-
it is essential that match fees do not deter players, including
occasional players
-
playing with fewer than XI is disastrous both from a cricket point
of view and financially
-
match fees should be the same for everybody, as otherwise an
expectation might be created that those paying higher fees are
more entitled to an active part in the match
-
nevertheless there are substantial differences in the ability to pay
of different players and this should be taken into account
-
there is a danger that the occasional player and the regular
player are better treated by a subscription system than the
intermediate player who plays eight or ten matches
It was agreed that we couldn’t hear one another and the tables were
rearranged and moved away from the middle of the room.
Nets are attended, typically, by eight or ten people, though
sometimes as few as four or as many as eighteen. Matt estimated,
conservatively, that a £1 charge for nets would not change
those figures much and would raise around £250 a year. Simon
S pointed out that almost all sports clubs have a system of
subscriptions.
It was agreed that there would be a £1 charge for nets; that
match fees would be £4 for evening games and £8 for
afternoons (this means that every over, regardless of the type of
match, costs 10p: that’s 4d a ball in old money). Subscriptions
would be introduced in four tiers, referred to for convenience as
MSc, PhD, junior staff and senior staff. Tentatively the
subscriptions for these levels were set at £10, £20,
£30 and £40, but no definite decision was made at the
meeting. The Treasurer thought that these measures would meet the
need.
-
A drinks interval, much needed.
-
Election of officers.
Simon Shaw was re-elected captain, Gregory as secretary, and a
slightly reluctant Rob as treasurer. Matt is leaving and was
thanked for his efforts: Alex Willcocks was elected vice-captain,
which includes running the nets. Roger was re-elected as
webmaster. Simon Dodd volunteered to do the statistics, and Chris
Middup volunteered (possibly in the military sense) to help him.
-
Captain’s report.
Chintan got us promoted to the top division of the indoor league
and then went to America, leaving behind a bat with the
descriptive word “ton” on it and a team out of its depth. We lost
all our matches, though we lost to the other promoted team only
off the last ball, and thanks to our superior record of bonus
points finished only one point behind them. Our bowling was quite
reasonable but we probably approached batting in the wrong
way. The indoor league is, nevertheless, fun.
In the season proper we won 14 matches and lost 14. This is less
good than last year, when we won 14 and lost only 11 (but it was
wetter): however, 14 wins last year was the most for a very long
time. Three matches were abandoned after they had started and
eight were cancelled. Five of the eight cancellations were because
the opposition were unable to raise a team. We raised a full team
for every match except one: four of us were at Cardiff watching
Monty Panesar play what turned out to be the decisive innings of
the summer and a fifth was unfit, and we had to play with only
ten. We used 34 players but there was a fairly consistent core of
about ten.
In 40-over cricket (including one game played without an over
limit) we won six and lost seven, thus being less successful than
in the 20-over version: this caused general slight surprise. On
the other hand some of our 20-over defeats were heavy (and some of
our wins overwhelming), whereas in 40-overs our only heavy defeat
was in the second match at Kilmington. We never really looked like
beating Bradford Town, though.
Our bowling was generally good. Kevin and Paul were a particularly
reliable opening pair. Roger batted very effectively, as did
Richard on the very few occasions he played. Ian Gillard played
rather more, but still not very much, and averaged 66. Matt alone
tried to look stylish, and usually succeeded. In 20-over cricket
we lacked hitters, Nigel being about the only one, but the bowlers
kept control of most things (not Everton Griffith). We were much
less good when batting first, especially in 20-over matches.
There were 11 50s, of which Matt and Ian G each made
three. Gregory took 27 wickets, just ahead of Alex W who took
- The only 5-wicket haul was taken by Saurabh, against Rode in
the last match of the season. The fielding was good (the captain
was too polite to mention the three very easy catches the
secretary dropped off his bowling) and Alex C and Roger both kept
well: Alex caught eight and stumped two, and Roger, startlingly,
had three stumpings for every catch. Simon Shaw, Matt and Chris
each caught six in the field.
The highlights in afternoon games were the first Kilmington match,
featuring a devastating innings by Ian G and a nerveless four by
Paul (and also the loss of four wickets for no runs, but never
mind); the second Bill Owen match, featuring another batting
collapse in a successful chase; and Winsley, featuring Ian again
and a Real Cricketer not actually doing quite enough damage to win
them the match. Priston cannot count as a highlight because we
lost but was a very successful fixture (and tea).
The 20-over highlights were the win against Canal Taverners and
the Bristol T20 tournament victory. Prior to that we had lost five
consecutive 20-over games: suddenly we won five times running,
convincingly. Winning the tournament also provided us with some
very welcome and timely publicity within the university.
Simon thanked Matt, and other players who are leaving, for their
contributions. Matt responded with an unscheduled but very welcome
vice-captain’s report. Winsley and the final match at Rode stood
out, because both of these were teams apparently better than us
and seriously trying to win, and we beat them: it was, apparently,
Rode’s only home defeat of the year. Matt also added that
captaincy is a lot easier when, as in this case, you do not have
to hide anyone in the field (a comment he made after the Winsley
match, where our ground fielding was crucial to the win). Finally,
he said, Simon should bowl and bat more.
-
Fixtures.
The fixtures list is satisfactory. The arrangement whereby we host
both matches against Cramer and Hay Hill makes sense under the
current financial regime but may not do so in the future. This
year we played no touring teams, which is unusual. The newcomers
to our fixture list this year were Nomads (we had a fixture
against them last year, but it rained), Bath CC, Priston, Pedigree
and Radstock College. Nomads and Priston were successes. It was
puzzlingly asserted that at Priston, sheep go “moo”. Radstock
College is run by Everton Griffith, who is universally liked but
rather too good at batting for us. He is trying to support youth
cricket and deserves every encouragement, short perhaps of some of
the stuff we bowled to him. Bath CC failed to produce a team and
Pedigree produced only part of one: these fixtures are therefore
doubtful. There are several possible alternatives. It will be
important next year not to have home fixtures cancelled at short
notice, as that is expensive.
-
Statistician’s report.
Some statistical features had already been noted in the Captain’s
report. Kevin added three runouts to his six catches: Matt (who
also had one runout), Chris M and Alex W also caught six. The best
bowling average by far was Charlie’s 7.75. Gregory was the leading
wicket-taker with 27, ostensibly at 17 but in fact rather more
than that since the damage done by Everton Griffith was not
recorded. Alex was next with 25, at an average of 13.5 plus
whatever Everton Griffith did to him (not so much). Paul’s economy
rate of 2.85 runs an over was more than one run per over better
than anyone else’s. On the batting side, five batsmen made 300
runs: Ian G averaged 66.6 at a strike rate of over 100. Nigel’s
strike rate was over 140, and Roger averaged 41.8. There was a
lack of random bizarre facts this year, and also a relative lack
of notable partnerships: Ian and Chris W at Kilmington and Ian and
Matt at Winsley were the biggest.
-
Awards.
These were, as is traditional, decided by the captain.
-
Best batsman: Matt. There was strong competition from Ian G,
Roger and others, but Matt consistently made runs when they were
needed and also hit his first six. He did fail sometimes, usually
when he still needed another forty overs to sleep it off.
-
Best bowler: Alex W. Kevin and Paul also bowled consistently
well, and Gregory took more wickets than Alex but paid more for
them in run rate and on average. Alex was consistent and accurate.
-
Best all-rounder: Nigel , narrowly ahead of Kevin: both
contributed substantially with the bat and the ball.
-
Best fielder: Alex W. Alistair’s great enthusiasm and energy,
especially in 20-over cricket, made him a candidate. Simon omitted
to mention himself. Alex was very reliable in the field and could
be used anywhere with equal effect.
-
Catch of the Season: Saurabh against UWE in the Bristol
T20. There were other good catches, by Ian G, Matt, Tom Rosoman
and Chris M among others, but none that induced the same stunned
look on the batsman’s face, or so convinced the opposition that we
were better than them.
-
Most Improved Player: Chris Middup was a clear winner, not only
for his catching. Ian G, Adam and Charlie were also mentioned.
-
Champagne moment: there were a lot of candidates here, and in
the end two awards were made. One was collective, for the Bristol
T20 tournament, which had no real rivals as a team high point. For
individuals there were more competitors: Paul’s conclusive
boundary at Kilmington, either of Ian’s 90s, Saurabh’s five
wickets at Rode. But Gregory won it by bowling Winsley’s pro for
not quite as many runs as he (once) made in a Test against India.
-
The A.J. Wolsthenholme Prize for running between the wickets
went to Rahul, for consistent indecision and an exceptional
display of loss of sense of direction at Bradford Town. Strangely
he was not involved in any actual runouts. The same could not be
said of Matt, who gave a comprehensive and disturbing account of
how he ran himself out at Rode three balls before the tea interval
and nearly, but not quite, stole this prize at the last minute.
-
Best Dressed: this award has occasionally been taken seriously,
but the burn hole in Matt’s jumper eliminated all competition this
year.
-
Duck of the Year: There were a few candidates, but our start
against UWE (0-2 after 0.2 overs) was so extreme, and the style of
the ducks so impressive, that the only choice was to give this
award jointly to Matt and Chris M (“Ive never struck a ball
better”).
-
Sledge of the Season: Alistair, not for his apparently
inadvertent advice to a not particularly slender opponent to get
some exercise by running quick singles, but for the remark “don’t
hang around and get your new shoes dirty”.
The meeting closed at 20:38. By this time England were 108-5 chasing
297, and it was agreed that there was no point in seeking a pub with
the cricket on the television.
|
Committee Members 2024:
Home Pitch:
|