|
Bristol T20 tournament, Sunday July 5th
Won the tournament.
1. Bristol Academics 90-7
Venturers 91-1
2. Cardiff 66-8
Venturers 67-3
3. Bristol Venturers (UWE) 116-4
Venturers 117-1
It is a long time since we actually won anything, at least in the
summer. This is only partly because we don't play competitively. The
Bristol T20 has been disorganised for ten years, but occasional
coincidences of weather, management and availability have allowed it
to happen a few times, usually with us involved. Bristol have always
won, challenged if at all by UWE, and our successes have been confined
to sometimes beating Cardiff.
It was therefore without great optimism that we took the field against
Bristol. We have been playing better cricket this year, but mostly at
weekends. We did expect to improve on our previous performances,
though.
Bristol's openers were two short Indians. This has been a feared
combination at least since the days of Gavaskar and Viswanath; but one
of them rather resembled Phil Hughes in his approach: he stayed leg
side of the ball and tried to swipe everything through cover. The
resemblance ended there, as he seldom succeeded. Paul kept him very
quiet. We never found out what his partner's style was as Kevin bowled
him immediately. The new batsman was more orthodox but no more
effective. Kevin removed him too, caught at mid-off. We did wonder
whether that had been a mistake, as more competent Indians seemed
likely to arrive shortly, and some competent non-Indians. Indeed they
did, when Simon T knocked the swiper's off stump out of the ground,
but it made no difference; Kevin and Paul had been extremely
economical and Nigel and Simon bowled well enough to contain the
middle-order batsmen. Only in Simon's last over did things go awry: he
started with a wicket but then lost his rhythm and got hit about. We
had enough control for this not to matter, but it did mean that the
impressive score at the halfway mark, 29 for 3, wasn't the start of an
utter disaster for them. On the other hand Simon had removed two
dangerous batsmen, so that Bristol were short of resources to attack
the last four overs, from Rob and Gregory. They needed the batsmen who
were in at that point to stay in; and one of them lofted Gregory to
Simon S almost straight away. Rob's first over contained only one loose
ball and his second none at all, and in the final over there was a
comedy runout and a good catch by Alastair off a near-wide (bowled
deliberately as the batsman charged down the pitch). Only at the very
end, when one ball produced a dropped catch and two separate
overthrows, rounded off with a fumble by the bowler, did our standards
dip.
Ninety can be an awkward target in a 20-over game on a doubtful
pitch. After two and a half overs it started to look impossible: a
shower drove us indoors, and got steadily heavier. We agreed to have
an early lunch and the names of Duckworth and Lewis were
mentioned. But the sun, watery at first, did return soon. Simon T got
out early, and Ian G and Nigel (dropped badly once) progressed
cautiously at first, though keeping up with the rate with the help of
numerous extras. Somewhere in the forties, though, they began to
accelerate. They did this with singles at first, and Ian's habit of
not running his bat in nearly cost him his wicket; but soon after
that, in a short volley of boundaries, the match was suddenly over. We
had nine wickets and seven and a half overs to spare,a huge margin.
Over on the other pitch, where we were supposed to go and play the
losers, things were rather closer. Cardiff had made only 71, and UWE
had reached 55 for 2, only to lose six wickets for next to nothing. We
watched as they tried to make eight off the last two overs: they
managed seven and a tie. The organisers decided that we were to play
Cardiff next, on the second and dodgier pitch.
Simon T was replaced by Andrew, who had sat out the first match. Again
we fielded and again Paul and Kevin were all but unplayable. Twice
Kevin did what Simon had done in the first match and knocked the off
stump out of the ground - not the same stump each time as one victim
was a left-hander. The surviving opener played and missed often, but
his new partner, the Cardiff captain, looked a threat especially in
what seemed likely to be a low-scoring match. Before he could get
going, though, Paul induced a leading edge and made the awkward low
return catch look easy. Simon S took an excellent catch off Paul's
bowling, but from a midriff-high full toss so (after a puzzled
silence) it didn't count. Kevin bowled a third batsman, Nigel removed
the opener when he finally got an edge, and Saurabh had bowled two
tidy overs when the rain returned. This time we had an early tea and
watched Roddick lose his tie-break on the television in the bar. It
was wet enough for some people to order pints. The rain stopped
suddenly. Most of us - not those really interested in tennis - put
boots on and went outside. The rain started again. Much later it
stopped properly. We hauled the tennis fans out to the cricket pitch,
spread sawdust around and resumed. From 22 for 5 it seemed unlikely
that they would recover. Nigel gave a few runs away struggling with
the wet ball, but Saurabh was as economical as before and Cardiff,
like Bristol before them, were left with no option but to attack
Gregory and Rob. This time it was Rob who got them out when they
tried, one caught by Kevin at mid-on and another at the wicket: he had
more catches dropped, including a simple one that wouldn't have
counted anyway (another no-ball for bowling a full toss with a wet
ball), which he dropped himself. Gregory also picked up a wicket when
one of Alex's many stumping attempts succeeded. The ground fielding
was good and there was no acceleration.
We were chasing only 66. In view of what had happened to UWE we had to
assume that either the pitch or the Cardiff bowling was
dangerous. Indeed the Cardiff bowling was quite good. They started off
with a no-ball, delivered from far too wide: the bowler seemed to
think that the damp crease permitted him to do that, but the batsman
is entitled to expect the ball to come from the required direction,
and after a few more balls the new footmarks would be as bad as the
old ones anyway. Moreover, he bowled much better from close to the
stumps. Alastair and Nigel began cautiously (there was no hurry) and
were beginning to settle when Alastair dragged a wide ball of full
length onto his stumps. In the same over Nigel was well caught at the
wicket down the leg side, and a collapse could be seen forming. So
could more clouds. We agreed to carry on regardless, but it didn't
rain hard again. Kevin was uncomfortable but determined; Ian was
careful when batting, though slightly less so when running between the
wickets. But there were runs to be had, and plenty of time (Kevin
briefly forgot that we were in the sixth over, not the sixteenth, and
had to be reassured). Cardiff's slow bowlers made less impression on
us than they had on UWE, and although there were few boundaries over
the wet grass we got home very easily. Kevin was caught at slip just
before the end, and it was Andrew who kept Ian company for the last
few moments.
If Bristol could beat UWE we would win the competition there and
then. We went over to watch, but it was clear that they couldn't. Now
there was a problem about who was to play on which pitch, caused by
the earlier tie; but in the end it was agreed that as Bath v UWE was
for practical purposes the final it should be played on the main
pitch.
Simon S stood down himself for this one, having captained well but
neither batted nor bowled in the other two. Rob, Kevin and Gregory
were all approached as possible captains; Rob was the least
reluctant. He won the toss and fielded, as requested. Paul and Kevin
opened again. The batting was better than Bristol's or Cardiff's, and
one of the openers was the left-handed Ivor, which made things more
difficult, but still they were hard to get away. Ivor is a sticker,
but the right-handed opener was clearly going to be dangerous if he
stayed in. Several times he cut at Kevin and missed, and Gregory at
slip pointed out to Saurabh in the gully that they might be in
business soon. Next ball the batsman connected with the cut, but hit
slightly under it. The ball travelled fast, about eight feet in the
air, over gully. Saurabh put up his right hand, hopped into the air,
and casually caught it. The batsman stared and stumped off; and from
then on we were winning. Not that UWE lacked for dangerous
batsmen. But Rohan has become Kevin's personal rabbit and was promptly
bowled by him again, and the right-handed captain skied Gregory,
brought on to deal with all the left-handers. A short debate took
place about whether it was Kevin's catch or Saurabh's, won by Kevin,
who caught it.
A fragment of an earlier debate:
Gregory: I want someone in on that single.
Rob: All right, I'll do it.
Gregory: I want someone fast in on that single.
That was as far as we got towards bowling them out, until the very
end. The next batsman, also a left-hander, swung powerfully at
anything on his legs. In due course we stopped bowling there, but we
also dropped him three times, none of them easy catches. With little
more batting to come they also had to be careful and the run rate
never got very high. Gregory having bowled earlier, it was left to
Saurabh and Rob to finish things off, and they did it very effectively
once Saurabh had worked a couple of full tosses out of his system. In
particular his last over was ideal, and during it Ivor was finally run
out by Andrew. It was only after the match that Andrew revealed that
his flat throw to the wicketkeeper had in fact been intended for the
bowler's end.
We had 117 to get. Alastair's usual aggressive running kept the wheels
turning while Ian played himself in, though taking on Rohan's arm was
not a good plan (Alastair escaped with a dive: it was Ian's
call). Then Ian started to play shots, and the target came down
quickly; by the time Alastair was out, for eight though it seemed like
twice that, the score was past fifty and we were only in the eighth
over. Nigel started to play shots immediately. A faster left-arm
bowler was brought on and hit out of the attack. The potentially
dangerous off-spinner UWE have was brought on, too late: they needed
both Ian and Nigel out to have any chance. A few more lofted drives
(but no sixes, nor LBWs, in any of our matches) and some quick running,
and quite suddenly it was over.
We were conclusive winners of the tournament. Ian and Nigel with the
bat and Kevin and Paul with the ball were the most effective, but
everybody who got a chance contributed substantially. We scored 272
runs for the loss of five wickets in thirty-eight overs, capturing
nineteen wickets ourselves. We never needed to bat beyond the
fourteenth over. There was no point at which any of our opponents
looked as if they might win.
We are rather puzzled and would like to be told how that happened.
Fixtures & Results 2009
|
Committee Members 2009:
Home Pitch:
|